An Easter Brunch After Church: How a False Narrative Took Hold Inside Stonebriar Church
An Easter Sunday brunch following services at Stonebriar Church became the setting for a disturbing sequence of events involving repeated phone calls, a false identity narrative, and mounting pressure placed on a guest to leave under urgent pretenses. This article documents what happened, how it unfolded, and how its effects carried into the church community afterward.
DALLAS, TX—On Easter Sunday in 2018, a private brunch following services at Stonebriar Church became the setting for a disturbing sequence of events that would later reverberate through the church’s social and women’s ministry circles.
The gathering, hosted by Marsha Cannonie, an alto in the church choir, was informal and not church-organized. It was framed as a welcoming invitation for single women after Easter services—an act that, at the time, appeared ordinary and pastoral in nature.
According to Victoria Cameron, who attended the brunch, what unfolded over the course of several hours was anything but.
From Church Lobby to Private Home
Earlier that same morning, Cameron said she encountered conversations in the church lobby involving paid referrals connected to child adoption. Business cards were being distributed, and specific dollar amounts were discussed. Cameron said the subject was presented enthusiastically among several women, including Cannonie, who encouraged her to consider whether she knew any children who might be referred.
Cameron described feeling uneasy about the conversation but withheld judgment, asking clarifying questions rather than making immediate assumptions. She said the discussion continued briefly in Cannonie’s kitchen before other guests arrived.
The brunch itself included four women: Cannonie, Cameron, a member of the church orchestra, and another woman who had previously lived in Cannonie’s guest room. Cameron was the only additional choir member present and said she felt honored by the invitation, interpreting it as a sign of welcome and safety within the church community.
As Cannonie prepared the meal, a wall-mounted phone in the adjacent dining room began ringing repeatedly. Cannonie answered multiple times, stepping away from both food preparation and the table. According to Cameron, Cannonie identified the caller as Ghislaine Maxwell.
Context of the Relationship and the Calls
Cameron said Cannonie spoke of Maxwell in a way that suggested social familiarity and desirability rather than distance. According to Cameron, Cannonie described herself as “just an acquaintance,” but spoke of knowing Maxwell as something that carried social weight among women in that circle. Cameron recalled the tone as aspirational, as though proximity to Maxwell was regarded as noteworthy or status-conferring rather than unusual. This framing, Cameron said, influenced how the phone call were initially received inside the home.
Cameron also said Cannonie described the call as business-related, explaining that Maxwell was asking questions about people who had represented her at the church earlier that day and raising concerns about how she herself had been represented. Cameron recalled the situation being discussed in a way that suggested the caller was communicating remotely rather than being physically present at the church at that moment. Cannonie indicated the calls involved complaints and possible employment issues, including discussion of terminating individuals who had drawn complaints. Cameron said this framing contributed to the perception that the calls were routine and professional in nature.
Repeated Phone Calls During the Meal
When Maxwell called during the brunch, Cameron said Cannonie explained that one of the concerns Maxwell shared was she believed Cameron was a specific young woman whose father had been hospitalized and was near death. She talked about the father’s urgent health condition as if she was sitting in the hospital waiting room where he was hospitalized. Maxwell also appeared to have prior knowledge that Cameron would be at the house that day and was attempting to reach her through the repeated calls.
Cameron immediately stated that she did not have a father in the hospital and could not be the person Maxwell believed she was. Despite this, the calls continued. According to Cameron, the urgency increased, and Cannonie relayed that Maxwell was pressing for Cameron to leave the house immediately to go to the hospital. At one point, Cannonie told Cameron that Maxwell had suggested she herself, or Jeffrey Epstein, could come in person to collect Cameron and take her there, but told her she would have to wait at Cannonie’s house for several hours for them to arrange to come by the house to pick her up. She spoke about having to arrange a flight in order to get to Dallas, and urged Cannonie to keep Cameron at the house until later that evening or early the next morning until she could arrive.
Cameron said she again denied the claim and reiterated that she did not have a father in the hospital. To resolve the situation, Cannonie asked Cameron to produce identification. Cameron showed a government-issued ID, which Cannonie relayed to Maxwell over the phone. Only after the identity mismatch was confirmed did the calls temporarily stop.
A Narrative That Did Not End
The brunch proceeded. The group prayed before the meal, including a prayer for the hospitalized man described in the phone calls. Conversation afterward was largely casual, with guests sharing personal backgrounds. Cameron said she believed the situation regarding her identity had been resolved.
However, the phone rang again later in the meal. Cameron said Cannonie again identified the caller as Maxwell, who challenged the validity of Cameron’s identification and continued to insist Cameron was the woman she urgently had to speak to, insisting her father was in the hospital and that she and Epstein needed to take her to see him in case he passed that day. Cameron showed her ID again, this time to the other guests, who confirmed it appeared legitimate.
After this call, Cannonie shared a separate story about a father searching for a missing daughter he believed had once attended the church. Cameron said she did not initially recognize any connection between the story and the phone calls.
Before the gathering ended, Cameron said Maxwell again called to urge that Cameron remain at the house until later that evening so arrangements could be made to retrieve her in person. Cannonie declined, stating clearly that Cameron was not who Maxwell thought she was. She told her flat out that the name on her ID did not match the name of the girl Maxwell was looking for. The brunch concluded normally, though Cameron recalled the phone ringing again as she was leaving.
Cameron left alone.
Aftermath Inside the Church
In the days and weeks that followed, Cameron said the narrative introduced during the brunch did not dissipate. She recalled choir members referencing the hospitalized father in conversation. At a subsequent women’s Bible study, Cameron said a visiting woman spoke publicly about the same incident, where she claimed to have visited the dying father in the hospital. She looked straight at Cameron during her story and said the entire time she was in his hospital room, all he did was plead for his daughter who refused to visit him—on his deathbed. Other women listened intently and looked toward Cameron with visible concern, as if they believed she was the daughter.
Despite Cameron having already denied the story and shown identification to prove she was not the daughter of this man, the implication persisted—that she was a daughter who had abandoned a dying parent.
According to Cameron, the story circulated not as a question, but as an assumption that was widely believed to be true, affecting how she was perceived within church social spaces.
Why the Incident Matters
This article does not assert intent or draw conclusions about trafficking coordination within Stonebriar Church social circles. It documents a single Easter Sunday sequence: a private gathering immediately following church services, repeated third-party attempts to remove a guest under false pretenses, and the subsequent spread of a false narrative within a religious community.
Cameron has said she shares the account now because of its relevance to broader reporting on trafficking-related concerns and social dynamics at Stonebriar Church. The incident stands on its own as a record of what occurred, how it unfolded, and how its effects extended beyond one afternoon.
How Readers Can Respond: Next Steps For Those Who Wish To Engage Thoughtfully 
Support Victoria’s Restoration Fund
Learn more about how you can stand with Victoria: Standing With Victoria
Read about The Trafficking Issue at Stonebriar Church
Stonebriar Church in Frisco, TX
Stonebriar Community Church is an Evangelical traditional style church located in the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex at 4801 Legendary Dr, Frisco, TX 75034. The pastor of Stonebriar Church at the time of this incident was founding pastor Chuck Swindoll, who retired in October 2024. Chuck Swindoll is an evangelical Christian pastor, author, educator, and radio preacher. He founded Insight for Living, and is chancellor emeritus at Dallas Theological Seminary. Jonathan Murphy is the current senior pastor of Stonebriar Church. The church website is: https://www.stonebriar.org
